Musings on lean in a development context

What exactly is the concept of ‘value’ in the context of an international development programme? Is it obtained from the outputs of projects, the outcomes of programmes, the longer-term impact of these outcomes, or a combination of all three? What value is there in building national capacity to manage programmes and projects. Who benefits directly or indirectly from these things? Who are the various stakeholders? What is civil society and to what extent is it or its component parts a stakeholder? What value do the various stakeholders perceive in a development programme? How do these perceptions vary? Are some perceptions of value more important than others? Are there any value conflicts and, if so, what effect do these have and how are they handled?

How about the concept of ‘value stream’. What does this look like in a typical development programme? Where is value being added and where is there waste? Where is the evidence for this?

Is it reasonable to think that the value stream might divide into several directions of flow at some point or points in the programme, with subordinate value streams running through the lifecycle of each project? Do these tributaries then rejoin the main flow at the various points of project closure, often towards the end of the programme? Is there also a separate value stream associated with gains in capability during the programme lifecycle? Or does all this completely misconstrue the concept of value stream?

And flow: what are the obstacles to value creation within the value stream and over the programme lifecycle? Which are most important? What are the causes of these obstacles? How can they be overcome?

Exactly how does the concept of ‘pull’ translate into a development programme? What is being pulled at the various points in the lifecle of the programme and its projects and who is doing the pulling at these points?

Online QDA

Online QDA is a useful learning resource. It describes itself as “a set of learning materials which address common issues of undertaking qualitative data analysis (QDA) and beginning to use Computer Assisted Qualitative Data AnalysiS (CAQDAS) packages.
The site contains material consisting of “text pages outlining issues and aspects of analysis and the approaches and theories found in qualitative research along with tutorials with audio and video materials. The Intro section explains how the information and tutorials are arranged and makes some suggestions about how to use this site.
The initial development was funded by the UK Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) as part of its Research Methods Programme which aims to improve the standards of research methods across the UK social science community. ESRC GRANT RES-333-25-0009.

Analytic Technologies

Analytic Technologiespublishes software for social network analysis and cultural domain analysis. The company is run by Roberta Chase and Steve Borgatti. Roberta handles operations while Steve writes the software. We are located in Lexington, KY. ” They offer one product for sale: UCINET (Windows software for analyzing social network data) and provide a number of free tools including Anthropac, NetDraw and KeyPlayer.

Developing a Research Method

In order to decide on a research method appropriate to your project, you must study the literature on research methodology as well as that on your topic. You need to understand the various types of research and their suitability for different circumstances. In your dissertation you will need to explain the method you have used and justify the choices you have made. The thought processes involved in developing this rationale will make the way ahead for your project much clearer.

One of the books recommended for purchase on WMG’s Research Methods book list is by David Gray (2009). In Chapter 2, Gray explains some important fundamentals including:

  • inductive and deductive reasoning;
  • research paradigms such as positivism (“the world is external and objective“) and interpretivism (“the world is socially constructed and subjective“);
  • research methodologies such as experimental research, phenomenological research, analytical surveys, action research or heuristic enquiry;
  • how to put these together within a coherent framework that also contains a timeframe and data collection methods.

In Chapter 7, Gray addresses research design based on qualitative methods. He argues that the choice of which strategy or strategies of enquiry to adopt in this approach will depend partly on the research paradigm adopted. He examines the main strategies of enquiry. He discusses various approaches to qualitative design.

An idea put forward by Gray that I find of special value is the use of a conceptual framework. Gray ascribes this idea to Miles and Hyberman (1994). He says that a conceptual framework describes in pictorial and written form “the key factors, constructs and variables being studied – and the presumed relationships amongst them“. The models that my students constructed on the whiteboard in our December tutorial [link1 and link2] were the beginnings of such a conceptual framework. Its power and usefulness lie in helping to establish a boundary for the research, to clarify what is inside and outside that boundary and the relationships which exist, and to enable unambiguous statements about the focus of the research.

Other important points made by Gray concern:

  • the unit of analysis – for example individuals, groups, organisations or communities;
  • types of qualitative data, their characteristics and how they are collected;
  • choice of sampling strategy;
  • when the data analysis processes should be planned.

These ideas merit serious thought. Time devoted to such thought delivers a big pay-back.

References

GRAY, D. E. 2009. Doing research in the real world, Sage Publications Ltd.

MILES, M. B. & HUBERMAN, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, SAGE publications, Inc.